Rob Mintenko, qwe, F
Mintenko, Rob BB 02-JUL-2019
Initial
12y7m
Rob Mintenko, qwe, F
Affiliate Candidate
Mintenko, Rob BB 02-JUL-2019
Growing patient, class II skeletal and dental malocclusion with mild upper and lower crowding, severe overjet and deep bite
Comprehensive orthodontic treatment involving a non-surgical and non-extraction plan, with segmental distalization of the maxillary arch with a class II Carriere Motion appliance followed by maxillary and mandibular braces with class II elastics. Re-evaluation for potential extractions would be made within the first 8-10 months of treatment, pending compliance with the Carriere and class II elastics (consideration would be given to extract #14 and 24).
1y6m Active Treatment




Mintenko, Rob BB 02-JUL-2019
Initial
12y7m










Mintenko, Rob BB 02-JUL-2019
FINAL
14y4m






Classification
Cl II
Chief Concern
'Doesn't like how much her front teeth stick out' (excessive overjet)
Proposed Treatment Summary
Comprehensive orthodontic treatment involving a non-surgical and non-extraction plan, with segmental distalization of the maxillary arch with a class II Carriere Motion appliance followed by maxillary and mandibular braces with class II elastics. Re-evaluation for potential extractions would be made within the first 8-10 months of treatment, pending compliance with the Carriere and class II elastics (consideration would be given to extract #14 and 24).
Appliance
Class II Carriere Motion with fixed upper and lower braces (0.022" bracket slot size)
Proposed Retention Planned & Timing
Fixed upper and lower retainers with upper and lower essix for lifelong night time wear
Anticipated Retention Time
0
Case History & Etiology
Moderately retrognathic mandible combined with mild protrusion of maxillary incisors contributing to the excessive overjet
Diagnosis
Skeletal
• Class II skeletal with moderately retrognathic mandible
Dental
• Full cusp class II malocclusion on the right and left
• Mild upper crowding and lower crowding
• 90% overbite
• Lower midline shifted 2mm to the right
• Mild upper crowding and lower crowding
• 90% overbite
• Lower midline shifted 2mm to the right
Facial
• Convex profile with retrognathic mandible
• Mesocephalic
• Mild excessive gingival display on smiling
• Mesocephalic
• Mild excessive gingival display on smiling
Treatment Objectives
• Bilateral class I occlusion
• Ideal overjet (correct excessive overjet)
• Ideal overbite (correct deep bite)
• Achieve symmetric midlines (shift lower midline to the left to be centered with upper dental midline)
• Aligned upper and lower arches
• Minimize/maintain gingival display on smiling (avoid increasing amount of gingival display on smiling)
• Ideal overjet (correct excessive overjet)
• Ideal overbite (correct deep bite)
• Achieve symmetric midlines (shift lower midline to the left to be centered with upper dental midline)
• Aligned upper and lower arches
• Minimize/maintain gingival display on smiling (avoid increasing amount of gingival display on smiling)
Treatment Plan
Treatment started with the use of a class II Carriere Motion, bonded from #13-16 and #23-26, with a lower essix and brackets on #36 and 46. Heavy class II elastics were used for 6 months to help with segmental distalization of the right and left maxillary posterior dentition, while also allowing for mesial out rotation of #16 and 26, to help correct the class II buccal occlusion. Great compliance was achieved and by the end of the 6 months of the Carriere use, we had achieved a super class I occlusion (a few mm class III buccal occlusion in molar and canine). At this time, the Carriere appliance was removed and upper and lower fixed braces were placed - special attention was given to not extrude the maxillary incisors further. Class II elastics were used intermittently during treatment to maintain the class I occlusion achieved with the Carriere Motion. The deep bite was corrected by intrusion of the mandibular incisors and relative intrusion of the mandibular posterior dentition (extrusion of the premolars and molars). Detailing bends were used in the final stages to idealize the occlusion and esthetics.
Treatment Plan Alternative
Consideration was given to the two alternative options: 1) an extraction based treatment plan to correct the severe overjet and class II malocclusion with extraction of #14 and 24, and 2) a growth modification treatment plan as the patient is moderately retrognathic where a Twin Block followed by braces could have been used. Based on the patient's initial age (12y7m), and great compliance with the Carriere Motion for 6 months, it was decided that a high quality result could be achieved without the need for extractions.